| Post a Message | Explore Forums | Browse Stock Messages | Hot Discussions | Top rated Messages | Top Boarders | |
|
|
|

calculus
Last visited by:
gunamjj, balaggan, noman_noorani, puri rk, bhumika5554, naveenb444, dilipm7, aahoo, indianstock, darshanaparikh, WhatsUP, Guest, dineshsahay, tunga, princekbr,
Long term investor, interspaced with bouts of day trading.
Also see calculus’s rated messages
08 Sep 2008 15:43
View full thread (28 messages)
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
07 Sep 2008 17:52
View full thread (2615 messages)
Tracked by: 108 Boarder
07 Sep 2008 12:51
View full thread (2615 messages)
Tracked by: 108 Boarder
07 Sep 2008 12:09
View full thread (1 messages)
Tracked by: 0 Boarder
07 Sep 2008 11:52
View full thread (13 messages)
Tracked by: 1 Boarder
07 Sep 2008 11:44
View full thread (159 messages)
Tracked by: 2 Boarder
What is without risk? Nothing!!!.
If you say that hydropower is clean or risk free, then think what would happen if one of the big dams were targetted by the terrorists.
The havoc would outdo any Chernobyl like disater or if it were to be damaged in an earthquake, not to mention the long term ecological damage
brought about by dams.
Like I said Nuclear fission is a medium term stop gap till we source other forms of energy which are truly clean & safe.
We have no oil or gas to cater to our long term energy needs.
The much taked about 'Carbon capture technology' for getting clean energy from coal is a pipe dream & will be confined to smaller projects. It envisages storing liquid CO2 in underground facilities.
How feasible is that on a large scale.
We have to traverse this path of nuclear adolosence on our long term goal to clean & safe energy....
If you say that hydropower is clean or risk free, then think what would happen if one of the big dams were targetted by the terrorists.
The havoc would outdo any Chernobyl like disater or if it were to be damaged in an earthquake, not to mention the long term ecological damage
brought about by dams.
Like I said Nuclear fission is a medium term stop gap till we source other forms of energy which are truly clean & safe.
We have no oil or gas to cater to our long term energy needs.
The much taked about 'Carbon capture technology' for getting clean energy from coal is a pipe dream & will be confined to smaller projects. It envisages storing liquid CO2 in underground facilities.
How feasible is that on a large scale.
We have to traverse this path of nuclear adolosence on our long term goal to clean & safe energy....
calculus’s Network
calculus Tracking Boarders (0)
calculus’s Interest Area
Tracked Topics




Offline
Platinum

