General

When in doubt Tell the truth.

Posted by : goldchest

Dear MD,

Looks like if our Browser has a Pop Up Ad blocker,message gets truncated - POP.Like you said in your message there are many "ifs" and "buts" about Truth selectively used by people to suit their own convenience.I am not sure we should bring God into the picture,much better if we follow our Conscience."Karma" is a word freely used by us to console ourselves when faced with failure.If we continue this thread any longer we may be mistaken for Teachers,if not Preachers.
TRUTH is bitter more often than not!!
Regards,

Goldchest.

When in doubt Tell the truth.

Posted by : goldchest

Dear MD,

Looks like if our Browser has a Pop Up Ad blocker,message gets truncated - POP.Like you said in your message there are many "ifs" and "buts" about Truth selectively used by people to suit their own convenience.I am not sure we should bring God into the picture,much better if we follow our Conscience."Karma" is a word freely used by us to console ourselves when faced with failure.If we continue this thread any longer we may be mistaken for Teachers,if not Preachers.
TRUTH is bitter more often than not!!
Regards,

Goldchest.

When in doubt Tell the truth.

Posted by : radhika_nandlal

Goldchest,

Its always better to say the truth and be done with it except in cases where saying the truth could make one's parents ill or a child afarid, and if the a lie has no major repercurssions.

TRUTH = FATE

When you speak the truth you are aiding god to complete his work efficiently. That wipes off a million karmas that could be more painful to endure, leave alone the fresh karms from harmful lies.

ALWAYS SPEAK THE TRUTH....

Past history bias

Posted by : Oldtimer

Assume the following
You are trading in a hypothetical market whose index is currently at 1000±1%.
You have no idea in which direction the market is going to head.

What is the probability that the market will break-out on the upside versus the downside. As we know nothing about the market\'s performance in the past, it is likely that there is an equal probability for it to go up or to go down. So taking a position would be totally random. This is not a real situation, but if it happens then there are equal number of people taking a positive view and a negative view.

Scenario 1: Now if we know that the market has made a recent high at 1010 after climbing slowly from around 770, then what view are we likely to take? Would we take a positive view that the Mindex is likely to touch 1100 first rather than test 900? Or would we assume that 9900 is likely to be tested first before reaching 1100?

Scenario 2: In another scenario the Mindex has come down to 1000 from 1300. In this scenario what is the view that we are likely to take (positive or negative)?

If one were an adherent of the go-with-the-trend philosophy then one should take a positive view in scenario 1, and a negative view in Scenario2. However it has been shown by OTMR, an organization studying investor behavior, that a majority of the people are likely to take a opposite view to the one suggested by theory:

In scenario 1 most traders take the view that the Mindex touching 900 before making a new high is more probable.
And in scenario 2 most traders take the view that it is highly probable that the Mindex touches 1100 first rather than reach 900.

They claim that traders/investors dont really follow the theories that they tout, but follow their gut feeling. This behaviour they have attributed to what they term as \'past history bias\'. Past history plays a significant role in decision making, because a person is familiar with the conditions and numbers in the immediate past than with what is new or has happened in the distant past.

It is due to this bias that most people miss a rally when it begins to happen and they end up chasing the price. Similarly in a bearish phase the investor is trapped by buying at lower levels, thinking that levels of the recent past can be achieved.

Keep this in mind whenever you make investing/trading decisions.

Also give your responses as to how you would behave in each of the above scenarios.

Regards
OT

It took me 15 min to understand lyrics...

Posted by : JAGDISH GABA

WBB,got contageous dear,it seems when mkt is directionless better sing,paani to itna barsa phir bhi north bihari paani ko tarsa
na roti na daal,aadmi hei behaal,
mehangai ka hai yeh haal,hum sab hain behaal,
sabji ke daam aasman par hain,
aur hum khade khade aasman ko dekh rahey hain,
nikamee sarkar ne hum ko nikamma kar diya
aadmi ko aadmi sey ladwa diya,
sab yugon ka ek yug aur woh hai andha yug

to all those ppl opposing the NDEAL.

Posted by : cnu112

China's 21st-Century Nuclear Energy Plan :
The People's Republic of China is implementing an energy program which will bring online as many as to 30 new nuclear power plants over the next 15 years, and which has put China in the forefront of world research and development in nuclear science and engineering. This effort stands in stark contrast to the situation in the United States, where the Bush Administration's "pro-nuclear" energy plan is to try get one new commercial power plant built over the next decade, and to delay development of advanced reactor systems—some of which the U.S. tested decades ago—into the indefinite future.

The Chinese economy has been growing at an average rate of 8% per year, with electricity demand growing twice that fast. The Ministry of Electric Power has estimated that 15-20% of China's present energy demand cannot be met, and that 100 million Chinese have no access to electricity. Last year, China's State Electricity Regulatory Commission warned that the situation was worsening, as the country faced, in the Summer of 2004, a shortfall twice as large as that of the year before. To keep up with its rate of economic growth, China estimates that it will have to double its electric-generating capacity every decade. At 385,000 MW (megawatts) of current online capacity, China has an electric grid system second only to the United States.

Simply expanding the use of coal to meet this growing demand is not an option. Already 40% of China's railroad capacity is dedicated to hauling more than 1 billion tons of coal per year (two-thirds of China's energy is produced from burning coal). Alhough China is the world's sixth-largest producer of petroleum, it now imports one-third of its oil. As far back as the late 1970s, China knew it had to go nuclear; now it is systematically carrying out the multifaceted program that will make it a world leader in nuclear energy technology.
China Goes Nuclear

China's multi-pronged nuclear strategy follows the same strategy as its program in space exploration. First, rather than reinventing the wheel, China has imported commercial power plants from Russia, France, and Canada, to have the immediate benefit of nuclear energy, and to train its own cadre of engineers and operators. Today, China has nine reactors operating and two under construction, with nuclear energy accounting for about 2% of its total electricity output.

In the late 1990s, as the large-scale construction of nuclear plants was under way, Chinese officials were already planning for the 21st Century. China plans to choose one reactor design (and supplier) for its next group of nuclear plants, to enable it to standardize its nuclear operations, rather than continue with the widely varying designs now in place, from different suppliers. The goal is to have an increase of nearly sixfold in nuclear capacity, up to 40,000 MW by 2020, from 8,700 MW today. Due to the size of China's electric system, even this aggressive effort will bring nuclear's share up to only 6% of installed electric-generating capacity. This program requires that at least two new reactors come online each year, over the next 16 years. By 2050, China plans to have 150,000 MW of nuclear capacity, equivalent to 150 large power plants. There are about 440 nuclear reactors today, worldwide, and 103 in the United States.

Critics of all political persuasions have insisted that such "breakneck" speed in nuclear power plant construction cannot be achieved. John Moens, an analyst at the U.S. Department of Energy, begged to differ. On Jan. 15, he told the New York Times: "In 1970 we had a net capability of 7 million kilowatt hours [of nuclear generating capacity in the U.S.], and by 1981 we had reached 56 million kilowatt hours. So the rate of growth [the Chinese] propose is not only conceivable, it has been done before."

According to officials from the China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC), the decision has not yet been made as to how many reactors in the next group of imported plants will incorporate the newer, recently licensed next- or third-generation technology, and how many will use the current-generation designs, with "some improvements." CNNC estimates that for quick expansion, the most efficient approach is to add more plants at existing sites, using the same reactor design as the operating units. More advanced, next-generation reactors will likely be chosen for new power plant sites. This program is of such national priority that, according to China Business Weekly, delegations which included Chinese President Hu Jintao have been visiting existing and potential sites for nuclear plants, along China's coastal areas.

In July, the government approved the construction of four nuclear plants, and in September, CNNC director Yu Jianfeng said during an interview at the World Energy Congress in Sydney that China will soon award an $8 billion contract for the four nuclear reactors, with work to begin 2007. Each set of two reactors will be located in Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces, which have been suffering from power shortages, and are expected to come online in about 2012. Yu said that about 70% of the equipment for the reactors will be Chinese-made.

China has invited Westinghouse, French-based Areva, and Russia's AtomStroyExport to bid on the first four plants. In September 2004, the government also approved construction of another four reactors.

As a second aspect of its overall effort, at the same time that China has been importing commercial-scale nuclear plants to add to its electricity grid, domestic programs have been under way to develop indigenous conventional nuclear power plant designs, in order to give China an independent production capability for domestic use, and also for export. The 300-MW reactor at Qinshan, designed in China and built with 70% of its components produced domestically, began operation in 1991, and helped create a Chinese nuclear industry. In Phase II of its domestic R&D program, two 600-MW indigenously developed reactors were installed at Qinshan, and became operational in April 2002 and May 2004.

In July 2004, Ye Qizhen, chief designer of the second phase of the Qinshan nuclear project, and a member of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, said that Chinese engineers could "easily develop" a 1,000-MW-class reactor, based on the 600-MW design, if they introduced foreign-developed design software. China Business Weekly reported in February that China plans to build its 1,000-MW reactor before the first foreign third-generation nuclear reactors are built, around 2012.

China's program to develop its own nuclear power plant production infrastructure is aimed at export, as well as domestic deployment. In 1999, the Chashma-1 nuclear reactor became operational, 167 miles south of Islamabad, in Pakistan. The 300-MW reactor had been completed with help from China. In 2004, China's First Heavy Industries Company won a public bid to supply the Chashma-2 reactor's pressure vessel, which will be built in Dalian and completed in 38 months.

The international nuclear non-proliferation mafia has tried to bully China into reneging on the latest Pakistan nuclear plant project, but since that reactor will be under the inspection regime of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and the U.S. is eager to procure at least part of China's $8 billion construction program, no threats have yet been made.
Versatile High-Temperature Reactors

A third facet of the program, occurring at the same time that the Chinese are importing commmercial nuclear plants, and developing their own capacity to build and export them, is the research and development program in which China is engaged, intended to push forward on the next-generation nuclear technologies.

Energy produced from the fission of nuclei is typically captured as heat and used to boil water for turbine-generator sets to produce electricity in a power plant. This is the least efficient use of the energy from nuclear fission: Two-thirds of it is wasted in the thermal-to-electricity conversion process.

If the temperature that can be extracted from a nuclear reactor is higher, in the 800-1,000°F range—perhaps three times that of a conventional reactor—that higher-quality heat can be used to produce hydrogen from water to be used for fuel, direct electrical production, and desalination.

China started a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor research and development program in the 1990s at Tsinghua University in Beijing, often described as China's MIT. Tsinghua also has a very active space engineering program, and has designed satellites and space experiments.

A $30 million, 10-MW high-temperature gas-cooled pebble bed reactor (HTR-10) began construction in 1995, and started thermal testing in December 2000. In 2003, the reactor was incorporated into the power grid. In the Fall of 2004, Chinese scientists proudly displayed their HTR-10 to an international group of nuclear experts, and carried out a demonstration, showing that it is "passively safe." In other tests, the coolant for the reactor has been switched off, and it cooled down by itself.

The "pebbles" in the reactor are the 27,000 graphite billiard-sized balls that enclose the fissionable uranium, insulating each particle and dispersing the fuel. Instead of circulating water, with its miles of pipes, the reactor is cooled by the circulation of helium gas, which can withstand higher temperatures. The reactor does not have to be shut down for refuelling, since the spent fuel balls can be automatically removed, and new ones inserted.

China is not the first country to build or test this advanced-design high-temperature reactor. Rudolf Schulten designed a pebble bed high-temperature gas-cooled reactor prototype that was built in what was then West Germany, in 1985. The United States also had a high-temperature test reactor in that period, in Colorado. But anti-nuclear hysteria and the decline in energy growth, due to growing depression economic conditions in the past 30 years, left those, and other, experimental reactors, shuttered or dismantled.

In the mid-1990s, the government national utility company of South Africa licensed the German pebble bed reactor design and has been developing a prototype modular small reactor. China chose Tsinghua University to be its center for the development of the technology.

China plans to have a full-scale 195-MW version of its HTR-10 on line by the end of this decade, at an estimated cost of $300 million. Half of the financial stake in the joint venture building the plant has been taken by one of China's largest electricity generators, Huaneng. Concrete will be poured in the Spring of 2007.

China's nuclear industry plans to sell these 200-MW-sized reactors to utilities and in rural areas as modules which can be mass-produced and assembled quickly, with additional modules grouped together as electricity demand grows. Wang Yingsu, an official of Huaneng, told the Financial Times during a recent tour of the HTR-10: "If it succeeds, we can then spread this technology both at home and to the whole world."

This is just an example of how China has plans to use Nulcer Enery and its very unfortunate that some litrate ppl themselves are opposing this.

Wisdom... :)

Posted by : micky59

You can consider youself wealthy if you have something that money cant buy.
:)

N DEAL

Posted by : radhika_nandlal

Freedom of religion is a Hindu's birthright he can convert to any religion.HAAAAAAAAAAA

Storyboard Admeter

Posted by : MMB Messenger

The I&B ministry, taking offense to the commercial for Axe Dark Temptation has written to the Advertising Standards Council of India asking it to refrain HUL from airing the ‘offending’ film. Do you find the Axe Chocolate Man commercial offending? Do take the poll and let us know your view. Your views will be aired on Business Center at 8 pm on Friday on CNBC TV 18